In Response to Red-Light Camera Supporter

This article is a response to Abbey's blog post Red-Light Cameras reducing crashes in Texas:

A few weeks ago I wrote an article in regards to Houston Mayor Annise Parker's inability to properly handle the city's red-light camera issue. While the post had less to do with the issue of using red-light cameras in general and more to do with her blatant incompetence, I brought up a few key points to think about when discussing whether or not these cameras are a good idea.

I agree that these red light cameras are a good source of revenue. More red-light runners will definitely be caught using these than with uniformed officers alone. However, I'm not too sure about the significant decrease in red-light-related traffic accidents. Consider that increasing the number of red-light cameras could decrease the number of police vehicles on the road. Personally, I think I'm quicker to hit the brakes upon seeing a police car than when approaching a traffic light. Reducing the number of live officers on the road could potentially lead to "No cop, no stop" attitudes causing people to run more red lights, not noticing that the cameras are in place.

Another drawback to these cameras is that in the event of a citation, there are no human witnesses to testify as to what actually occurred and whether or not there were special circumstances that need to be considered that were in play at the time of the alleged violation.

I see these cameras as a two-edged sword. It's really a much more difficult issue to tackle, and definitely deserves a second glance by lawmakers all over Texas.